Think Deeply, Think Well.
Founded by Drs. Sara and Jack Gorman, authors of the revolutionary new title ‘Denying to the Grave’, Critica is a community committed to making rational decisions about health and security. In a culture dominated by polarizing politics, and an abundance of unchecked misinformation, Critica exists to revolutionize the role of science in making rational health decisions.
See what we’ve been up to lately at Critica.
Sara Gorman on Alaska Public RadioMay 3, 2018
How Should We Talk to Our Kids about Gun Violence?April 19, 2018
Sara Gorman Discussing Scientific Evidence on LLAMA PodcastApril 12, 2018
Read our take on important and relevant health and science topics.
January 11, 2019 | Awareness, Communication, Concepts & Methods, Psychology, Public Health, ResearchContinue Reading ➝
Editor’s Note: Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby are both advisors to Critica. Their biographical sketches can be found on our website. Together, they are authors of the book Reason in the Balance: An Inquiry Approach to Critical Thinking. We don’t have to look far to find examples of resistance to credible and trustworthy evidence. We […]
Continue Reading ➝
Most scientific projects these days involve teams of scientists, often working at different institutions. But the job of writing the manuscript about the project and its results that is submitted to a scientific journal for publication consideration is usually given to a single person, most often the first author of the paper. After he or […]
The gap between what scientific evidence shows and the public believes has never been wider. In “Denying to the Grave: Why We Ignore the Facts that Will Save Us” Drs. Sara and Jack Gorman explore the reason behind science denial. The renowned father-daughter team call upon psychology, behavioral economics, epidemiology, and neuroscience to identify six basic reasons that people refuse to accept scientific findings. Using case studies such as vaccination refusal, personal gun ownership, climate change denial, and fear of GMOs, the authors show that even highly intelligent people are prone to fall victim to false conspiracy theories, anti-science charismatic leaders, and the confirmation bias, to make errant risk predictions and to shun scientific complexity. The Gormans make seven explicit recommendations for closing the gap between scientists and the lay public, placing the burden on scientists, journalists, educators, and all consumers of scientific information.
Will science survive in a ‘post-truth’ society?
Following the publication of our critically acclaimed book, Denying to the Grave, Jack and I are launching Critica, a place for respectful dialogue about health and security matters. Come join us in exploring the ways our psychology and perceptions lead us to misguided decisions, and help us develop methods and programs for making informed ones.