Critica Commentary is a place for discussion of all things related to denial of scientific evidence and health and science literacy. Here you will find longer pieces about particular topics, such as medical misdiagnosis and conflicts of interest, as well as interviews with key people working at the intersection of health policy, science journalism, science education, and psychology, among other fields. You may also find guest posts by authorities in the field as well as by people with fascinating stories to share and analyses of recent news articles, studies, and current events. If you are interested in writing something for Critica, please contact us here.

Would you like the latest Commentary articles delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to Critica

Want to take the conversation further?

Leave a comment on an article or message the Gormans directly from the Contact page.

  • The Terrorist Non-Threat is the Real Threat
    March 14, 2017 | Comments

    If I were told that an imminent threat to the lives of my family and many others could only be stopped by banning travel and immigration into the United States I would be hard-pressed to protest such a move. That is the justification for President Trump’s recent executive order banning entry to the US of […]

    Continue Reading ➝
  • The New Yorker reviews Denying to the Grave
    March 9, 2017 | Comments

    “These days, it can feel as if the entire country has been given over to a vast psychological experiment being run either by no one or by Steve Bannon,” laments Elizabeth Kolbert in her recent review of Denying to the Grave in The New Yorker.  Kolbert’s review grapples with the recent increasing trend toward “alternative facts” and denial […]

    Continue Reading ➝
  • Everything You Need to Know about Conflicts of Interest
    March 3, 2017 | Comments

    In our new article on Psychology Today, we raise the issue of conflicts of interest that don’t involve money. We call these “emotional conflicts of interest.” They represent instances in which an author has an emotional relationship with his or her topic, creating the possibility of biases that may be just as strong as those […]

    Continue Reading ➝
  • Welcome to Critica!
    January 28, 2017 | Comments

    Do you know someone who thinks childhood vaccines cause autism? Have you ever had a conversation with someone who believes that climate change is not real? Have you ever searched the web seeking an answer to a health-related question, such as “is coffee good for you?” and been utterly confused as a result? Or have […]

    Continue Reading ➝
  • How the Culture of Donald Trump Will Harm Us All
    December 9, 2016 | Comments

    “Electing a leader who creates a culture in which the individual reigns supreme over the ‘establishment’ can only mean one thing: people will be emboldened to completely ignore decades of consensus in the expert scientific community in favor of their own opinions, which have often been formed under extremely biased conditions, are usually left unchecked, […]

    Continue Reading ➝